The
Russian president showed up at the United Nations on Monday for the
first time in a decade, proposing a coup against U.S. global leadership
and seeking to wrest control of a coalition battling ISIS away from
America's grip.
And he wasn't the only
leader of a country challenging the United States to effectively upstage
Obama at the annual global meeting, which a U.S. president
traditionally uses to command the spotlight.
Speeches
by Chinese President Xi Jinping and Iranian President Hassan Rouhani on
the 70th anniversary of the creation of the world body also left Obama
defending not only his personal foreign policy legacy, which is already
under assault at home from Republican presidential candidates, but the
entire concept of a world order based on seven decades of U.S. global
leadership.
The day of speech-making,
which also included an address by Cuban leader Raul Castro and Egyptian
President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, underscored the multipolar challenges to
U.S. power, as slumbering empires seek a resurgence and America faces
military challenges from Eastern Europe across the Middle East to Asia.
Obama
has embraced a policy of encouraging other actors to address threats in
their region, for instance pulling Saudi Arabia and Jordan into the
coalition to fight ISIS. But the approach means that other forces
joining the fray -- including Iran and now Russia in Syria -- may not
necessarily agree with America's preferred end game.
Obama
offered a full-throated justification of his policies -- particularly
emphasizing diplomacy over the use of force -- in his own U.N. address,
but he seemed on the defensive amid claims by critics that his policies
have emboldened U.S. adversaries.
The
most ardent challenger on Monday was Putin, who appears to be probing
openings in Ukraine and Syria where he believes the U.S. president will
not resist. He recently ordered a military buildup in Syria apparently
in support of President Bashar al-Assad, a longtime Russian client, and
went behind Washington's back to conclude an anti-ISIS intelligence
alliance with Iran, Syria and Iraq just this weekend.
Russia criticizes U.S. interventions
Putin's
message at the U.N. podium Monday was a simple one: U.S. interventions
and unilateralism have backfired in the Middle East, and it is time to
try something new.
His speech will do
little to undercut a widespread impression in many Western capitals that
his aim in Syria is not just to bolster a Moscow ally but, primarily,
to thwart U.S. power and influence in the Middle East.
Putin
took particular aim at U.S. involvement in Iraq and Libya, which he
said fostered a power vacuum filled with "extremists and terrorists."
"Do you realize now what you've done?" he asked.
He
called for a ministerial conference and then a U.N. resolution to
reorient strategy against ISIS -- even though many U.S. observers
believe his real aim is to prioritize attacks against rebels opposed to
al-Assad and to thwart U.S. aspirations in a region in which Obama has
shown little appetite of becoming embroiled.
Like
Russia, China is also a nation that once enjoyed great power and is now
seeking a rebound. Xi, president of a nation that Washington faults for
stoking tensions in Asia with its territorial claims at sea while
increasingly elbowing the United States in the Pacific, hit out at
criticism of China's communist system.
And
in a thinly veiled warning against new U.S. military adventures, he
warned that "those who adopt the high-ended approach of using force will
find that they are only lifting a rock to drop on their feet."
And
Iran, which the United States accuses of supporting terror throughout
the Middle East, portrayed its deal with world powers over its nuclear
capabilities as an example of U.S. capitulation and blamed "incorrect
actions of newcomers to the region and naive transregional actors" -- a
clear reference to Washington -- for the chaos in the Middle East.
Sensing
the rising challenges to U.S. power that were all too evident at the
U.N. on Monday, Obama openly faulted the perception -- fueled by
Republican presidential candidates -- that he is a weak leader who has
emboldened American adversaries.
Obama looks to defend his legacy
He
seemed to be addressing the historians who will consider his legacy as
much as his contemporaries on the world stage, especially when he
defended his policy of cooperating with some of the very leaders he
faults.
"We see in our debates about
America's role in the world a notion of strength that is defined by
opposition to old enemies, perceived adversaries, a rising China, or a
resurgent Russia, a revolutionary Iran," Obama said.
He
was particularly contemptuous of Putin, mocking "state-controlled
media" notions of a revived Russia. He said Ukrainians wanted to align
with Europe not Moscow and pointed out that sanctions had led to a
"fallen ruble and the emigration of more educated Russians."
"History
is littered with the failure of false prophets and fallen empires, who
believed that might always makes right, and that will continue to be the
case. You can count on that," Obama said.
But
Obama also acknowledged that he was open to a realistic approach that
could see him work with Russia and Iran to fight ISIS and back a
"managed transition" away from al-Assad.
Seeing
al-Assad remain in power for some time and cooperating with Iran on
Syria are positions that the administration has long frowned on, and
their embrace exposes Obama to criticism from those at home as well as
from the adversaries that he faced on the world stage Monday.
Florida
Sen. Marco Rubio, who is making foreign policy a centerpiece of his run
for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, warned that Putin was
making a case that American leadership had failed in the Middle East and
Obama was to blame.
"The President has
fallen into that. He's in fact strengthened Putin's hands," Rubio said
in an interview with NPR that aired Monday, complaining that states in
the region were despairing at the lack of a U.S. strategy to beat ISIS.
"If left with a choice between Russia and nothing, they're going to choose Russia," Rubio said.
Obama
has made no secret of the fact that he disdains Putin as a bully and
the Russian leader appears to view his opposite number as weak. The ill
regard was noticeable in the days leading up to their meeting along the
U.N. sidelines, with each side arguing that the other had pushed for the
meeting and declaring that the talks were focused entirely on their own
priorities -- Ukraine in the case of Obama and Syria for Putin.
While
Obama arguably lost the power play by participating in the meeting --
he has shunned Putin since his annexation of Crimea in 2014 -- both
sides ultimately conceded that they still need to work with each other
by showing up and awkwardly shaking hands for the cameras Monday.
It
seemed clear that Obama did not particularly want to be there, but Ben
Rhodes, a deputy national security adviser, told CNN's "The Lead" on
Monday that it would have been "irresponsible" not to meet Putin and
test his intentions.
It was also an
appearance that will likely play better in Moscow, where Putin wants to
convince Russians he is a key actor on the global stage, than in
Washington.
No comments:
Post a Comment